• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Phone: 3465 9332

Logo
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Courtney Barton – Legal Practice Director & Founder
    • George Finn – Director
    • Chris Colwill – Senior Associate
    • Ellie Prior – Associate
    • Hannah Radunz – Solicitor
    • Tenayah Miano – Paralegal
    • Alice Chapman – Paralegal
    • Rachel Elaurant – Legal Assistant
  • Our Services
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
  • Fixed Fees
  • Common questions
    • Spousal & Separation
      • Beware the criminal consequences of false allegations of sexual abuse
      • Initial Contributions Count – 8 years + 1 child = 78%/82% to Husband
      • Validity of Overseas Orders – Parenting, Marriage and Divorce Orders
      • Superannuation Splitting in Financial Agreements
      • Is my Binding Financial Agreement Binding?
      • Bodilly & Hand: Spousal Maintenance ordered 17 years after separation
      • Admissibility of admissions at mediation in court proceedings
      • Does your Financial Agreement Protect you from a maintenance claim?
      • The Alter Ego Principle – When a Spouse uses a trust to hide assets
      • Do I have to mediate before court? The exemptions Explained
      • Pet Custody – Who gets the dog in a divorce?
      • Top 10 Myths in family Law Finally Exposed
      • Honesty is the best policy – Why tell your divorce lawyer everything
      • My ex is selling assets. What can I do??
      • 6 secrets revealed to help you protect your assets and your family after separation. No. 1 and 2 will blow your mind.
      • Spousal Maintenance – Do I have to support my ex after divorce?
      • Who stays in the home after separation?
      • Can I go to court without doing mediation first?
      • Assessing initial contributions in a long relationship
      • What to do and what not to do before you separate
      • CGT rollover for marriage breakdowns – Ellison & Sandini Explained
      • Domestic Violence Order Applications – How to boost your chance of success
      • Going back to work after Divorce
      • Mediation
      • 10 tips to Protect your Assets
      • Am I in a De Facto Relationship?
      • Property Acquired after Separation – how is it treated?
      • Divorce – What you need to know
      • Petrie Family Law Expert speaks about ‘The Twelve year Itch’
    • Parent
      • Court Ordered Paternity Test – What, Why and How
      • NEWS ALERT – You do NOT need a s60I certificate to file your parenting application – Valack & Valack
      • What is sole parental responsibility?
      • How does a DVO affect parenting orders?
      • Do you want sole Custody? Here’s what NOT to do.
      • SHOCK: Drug use in Australia worse than ever. Drugs & family law explained
      • SHOCK: Drug use in Australia worse than ever. Drugs & family law explained
      • When is supervised time ordered? Is Narcissistic Abuse enough?
      • Interim Parenting Orders
      • What is substantial and significant time?
      • Am I a parent?
      • My ex is in contravention of a Parenting Order. What can I do?
      • My Parents lent me money. Is it treated as a gift or a loan?
      • Gay Couple Win Appeal on sperm donor ‘parent’
      • How to spend more time with your children
      • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes: Part 2
      • Im not a parent. Can I apply for a parenting order? Non-Parent Parenting orders explained.
      • Can Parenting Orders be changed?
      • Step-Parent Adoption Explained
    • Child
      • What age can a child decide where they live?
      • Finally revealed: Top 10 things people do wrong in child custody matters
      • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
      • I want sole custody of my child
      • Rights to return of your child if taken to a Non-Hague Convention country
      • How to deal with false allegations in family law
      • Unilateral relocation of children
      • Prevention is better than Cure – Interim Relocation of Children Cases
      • International Travel with Children After Separation
      • Airport Watch List Orders / Pace Alert Orders
      • Application to change parenting orders because of children’s changed views dismissed
      • When can you change your child’s surname?
      • Change in residence for children because of Mother’s inability to protect the children from harm
      • Courtney’s Cases: Interim Orders appealed as Judge avoids determining issues
      • Mother’s persistent accusation that the Father sexually abused their child results in orders for no time with the Mother
      • Relocation – Full Court confirms decision allowing ADF Mother a ‘blank cheque’ relocation to wherever posted in her employment
    • Property
      • Top 15 things people do wrong in a property dispute
      • Hiding assets in a divorce
      • Injunction to stop my ex selling assets
      • What is a Superannuation Payment Flag?
      • Difference between property and a financial resource in family law
      • Impact of overseas divorce on Australian property settlement
      • How Trusts are dealt with in a Property Settlement
      • Redundancy payment – how is it treated?
      • Future inheritances – when can they be taken into account?
      • Can the court order someone to leave a house? – Ouster Orders
      • Time Limits in Property Settlement
      • Beware: failure to disclose may derail your consent order
      • Duty of Disclosure
      • What is just and equitable?
      • Why you should formalise your property settlement
      • Is domestic violence relevant in a property settlement?
      • Varying property orders
      • Defaulting on Property Orders is Dangerous
      • Effect of Bankruptcy on property settlement
      • Courtney’s Cases: Centrelink fraud or a fraudulent representation to the Court?
      • Limitation periods against solicitors for defective Financial Agreements
      • Clayton & Bant – A multi-jurisdictional family law dispute
      • Dunworth & Faletti: Application for injunction to stop sale of property where jurisdiction not yet established
      • Court dismisses application for property settlement for same sex couple of 27 years
    • Child Support
      • I want to set aside a Binding Child Support Agreement
      • I want to challenge my child support assessment
    • Other Legal
      • Out With the Old, In With the New: Why Fixed Fees are better
      • NEWSFLASH – What are the New Family Law Rules?
      • Apprehended Bias – should Judges & lawyers have drinks pre-judgement?
      • Inquest of Jack & Jennifer Edwards – Lessons Learned
      • 6 things you MUST know before hiring a family lawyer
      • Admissibility of opinion evidence & expert evidence in family law matters
      • Admissibility of recordings in family law cases
      • COSTS ORDERS
      • WARNING PRACTITIONERS: New Family Law Rules from 1 March 2018
      • Review of the Family Law System
    • Covid-19
      • The Covid-19 Vaccination – Is mutual parental consent required?
      • I want to apply to the Family Court for inclusion in the Covid-19 List
  • Family Law Videos
  • Family Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Success Stories
  • Narcissistic Abuse

Courtney’s Cases: Centrelink fraud or a fraudulent representation to the Court?

November 5, 2018 By Barton Family Law

Courtney’s Cases: Bisset & Rounds

The Case of Bisset & Rounds is a very interesting case where the Judge had to determine, did Ms Rounds commit centrelink fraud or a fraudulent representation to the Court? The Case serves as a warning for parties who are defrauding Centrelink or the ATO in respect of their income and assets.

The result was that the Court refused to accept the submission that Ms Round’s property was held on trust for her Mother and it was included in the pool available for distribution.

Read on to find the relevance of assertions made by Ms Rounds to Centrelink and the ATO, to the Court’s decision.

Bisset & Rounds [2018] FCCA 459

In Bisset & Rounds, one of the main issues in dispute between the parties was whether property B should be included in the property pool. Mr Bisset alleged it should be included in the pool whilst Ms Rounds alleged it was held on trust for her Mother.

The parties were 54 at the time of the trial, having been in a de facto relationship for 14 years.

The property pool at the time of the Trial was one of the central issues in dispute, namely in relation to Property B. The issue in relation to property B was that this property was purchased after separation, in the name of Ms Rounds with the assistance of $50,000 received from her Mother (with a total deposit of $80,000 being received by Ms Rounds from her mother into her account). Additional funds were contributed by Ms Rounds mother to her account thereafter of $16,000.

It was argued by Mr Bisset that this property should be included in the pool.

It was argued by Ms Rounds, that this property was being held on trust for her Mother as were all the funds that were in Ms Rounds bank account and that that account was operated by her Mother and held for the benefit of her Mother.

The arrangement alleged by Ms Rounds was that property B was purchased in Ms Rounds name with a mortgage secured over it but that Ms Rounds Mother was always intended to be the beneficial owner of that property and that Ms Rounds Mother would live in that property and contribute towards the mortgage repayments and all outlays for the property.

The evidence at Trial supported that Ms Rounds was responsible for the mortgage secured over the property but that her mother made ‘rental repayments’ which were less than the mortgage and Ms Rounds mother covered all outgoings for the property. Ms Rounds declared the property as hers on her tax returns and in doing so obtained a negative gearing advantage in respect of her income.

Evidence produced at Trial by Ms Rounds, as to why she needed to buy the property in her name and not her mother’s was inconclusive. Despite her saying she held property B on trust for her Mother, she gave evidence that there was no trust arrangement in place and there was no evidence of the existence of a trust on her financial statement.

Evidence produced at Trial by Ms Round’s Mother was that she was unable to purchase a home in her sole name, as the lending institutions would not take her on, due to her age and income. Documentary evidence from Centrelink revealed that Ms Round’s Mother was receiving a pension and rent assistance on the basis that she held less than $3,000 in various bank accounts. There was no evidence to support a conclusion that Ms Rounds Mother had declared to Centrelink that she is the beneficial owner of property B or of the funds held in her daughter’s bank account.

There was no evidence produced by Ms Rounds as to why she did not advise Centrelink that she held a beneficial interest in the property, she she did not advice centrelink she had dispersed $80,000 to her daughter to purchase the property, why she declared $230 per week payments as rental when she was the beneficial owner of the property, why centrelink records showed that she did not own a home, shares her accommodation with the owner of the home and pays board of $200 per week and why the position she presented to centrelink, the bank and the ATO was completely at odds with the position that she and M Rounds presented to the Court.

The Court did not accept the submission that the property held in Ms Rounds name was held on trust for her mother and expressed concerns about Ms Rounds and her mother colluding to arrange her finances in a manner to as to provide her with the best possible centrelink benefit.

His Honour went on to say:

“The respondent in the course of cross examination clearly stated that the concept that the property was held on trust by her for her mother was “a term which my lawyer suggested.” Any concept in the Respondent’s mind that the property was held on trust appears to be something that was formulated in the course of these proceedings.”

There has been a course of conduct undertaken by the respondent and her mother in respect of her interactions with amongst other things, Bank A bank, the Australian Taxation office and Centrelink, that is consistent with teh view that the Respondent is in fact the owner of Property B and the Bank A bank account.” 

If I am wrong on this, then there are grave concerns that the Respondent and her mother have colluded in providing wrong information to Bank A bank, the Australian Tax Office and Centrelink.” 

The Court therefore preferred the position that Ms Rounds was the owner of property B, having been gifted a significant sum by her mother and in return the mother was able to occupy the property for nominal rent together with payment of the outgoings.

The contributions of the parties were said to significantly favour of Mr Bisset and the Court determined that the contributions were assessed at 73% to Mr Bisset and 27% to Ms Rounds.

An adjustment of 10% was made in favour of Ms Rounds due her lower income earning capacity.

The overall adjustment was 63% to Mr Bisset and 37% to Ms Rounds.

Given that property B said to be held ‘on trust’ for Ms Round’s Mother, was included in the property pool, having regard to the assets sought to be retained by each party, in order to achieve the above division, a cash payment of $156,000 was required to be made by Ms Rounds to Mr Bisset.

Courtney’s Cases: What can we learn? 

It is very important to make full disclosure Centrelink, the ATO and all other entities you associate with in respect of the ownership of your assets and when you enter a de facto relationship with another person.

Failure to do so could result in the Court making a report to Centrelink and the ATO about your conduct which may result in a significant liability being incurred by you. It could also mean that negative inferences are made by a Court about the ownership of assets or the nature of your relationship, which could have a significant negative impact on your property settlement entitlements.

Contact us 

If you have separated and need advice in relation to the division of property between you and your ex partner, and the impact of any declarations you have made to Centrelink, our family law expert Courtney Barton can help you.

Contact us on 3465 9332 to book a reduced rate consultation with one of our family law experts to have a confidential discussion about your individual circumstances.

 

Filed Under: Commonly Asked Questions, Property

Barton Family Law

Primary Sidebar

Online Enquiry

.

    I would like to book a reduced rate initial consultation with you

    Footer

    Areas of Practice

    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Mediation Representation
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements

    What makes us different from other Law Firms?

    Our Brisbane Divorce & Family Lawyers:

    • Only do family law all day every day. That makes us really good at what we do;
    • Are dedicated to helping you work through your family law issues so you can have a fresh start;
    • Have your best interests at heart;
    • Have the knowledge and experience to solve your family law problems, no matter how complex;
    • Will help you to reduce the conflict with your former partner;
    • Will fight for you and your children;
    • Provide exceptional quality service to you, tailored to your individual case needs;
    • Will educate you about your options, the steps you need to take and we will develop a strategy to help you to achieve a fair outcome and the best practical outcome for you and your family;
    • Will provide you with practical, realistic, commercial and strategic advice to empower you to make smart decisions following separation that will save you time, money and stress;
    • Will deliver an outcome to you quickly and cost effectively, with fixed fees for certainty;
    • Will do everything within our legal power to get you the best outcome for you and your family;
    • Are with you, supporting you, every step of the way from negotiations, to mediation, to litigation and settlement.
    Individual liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

    Contact Us

    Petrie Office

    • Address: 4/996 Anzac Avenue, Petrie QLD 4501
    • Parking: Underground parking available at the back of the building via O’Loan Street
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Petrie Family Lawyers

    Chermside Office

    • Address: 822 Gympie Road, Chermside QLD 4032
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Chermside Family Lawyers

    Aspley Office

    • Address: Aspley Hypermarket, 59 Albany Creek Road, Aspley QLD 4034
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Aspley Family Lawyers

    Copyright © 2022 | Website hosted by Lift Legal Marketing