• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Phone: 3465 9332

Logo
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Courtney Barton – Legal Practice Director & Founder
    • George Finn – Director
    • Chris Colwill – Senior Associate
    • Ellie Prior – Associate
    • Hannah Radunz – Solicitor
    • Tenayah Miano – Paralegal
    • Alice Chapman – Paralegal
    • Rachel Elaurant – Legal Assistant
  • Our Services
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
  • Fixed Fees
  • Common questions
    • Things you need to know following separation
      • Top 10 Myths in family Law Finally Exposed
      • Honesty is the best policy – Why tell your divorce lawyer everything
      • What to do and what not to do before you separate
      • Time Limits in Property Settlement
      • Family Court Process
      • Why you should formalise your property settlement
      • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
      • Duty of Disclosure
      • Beware: failure to disclose may derail your consent order
      • Can the court order someone to leave a house? – Ouster Orders
      • Who stays in the home after separation?
      • Property Acquired after Separation – how is it treated?
      • Top 15 things people do wrong in a property dispute
      • Finally revealed: Top 10 things people do wrong in child custody matters
      • COSTS ORDERS
      • Going back to work after Divorce
      • 6 things you MUST know before hiring a family lawyer
      • Beware the criminal consequences of false allegations of sexual abuse
      • Divorce – What you need to know
      • Petrie Family Law Expert speaks about ‘The Twelve year Itch’
    • Spousal Maintenance
      • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
      • Spousal Maintenance – Do I have to support my ex after divorce?
      • Bodilly & Hand: Spousal Maintenance ordered 17 years after separation
    • Parenting / Child Custody
      • What is sole parental responsibility?
      • How does a DVO affect parenting orders?
      • I want sole custody of my child
      • Do you want sole Custody? Here’s what NOT to do.
      • Most Common Child Custody Arrangements
      • Drug use in family law explained
      • Interim Parenting Orders
      • How to deal with false allegations in family law
      • What is substantial and significant time?
      • Am I a parent?
      • Court Ordered Paternity Test – What, Why and How
      • My ex is in contravention of a Parenting Order. What can I do?
      • Gay Couple Win Appeal on sperm donor ‘parent’
      • How to spend more time with your children
      • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes – Part 1
      • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes: Part 2
      • Im not a parent. Can I apply for a parenting order? Non-Parent Parenting orders explained.
      • Can Parenting Orders be changed?
      • When are a child’s views given weight by a Court?
      • What age can a child decide where they live?
      • Application to change parenting orders because of children’s changed views dismissed
      • When can you change your child’s surname?
      • Courtney’s Cases: Interim Orders appealed as Judge avoids determining issues
    • Hague Convention & International Child Abduction
      • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
      • Rights to return of your child if taken to a Non-Hague Convention country
    • Relocation of children & Prevention
      • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
      • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
      • Unilateral relocation of children
      • Prevention is better than Cure – Interim Relocation of Children Cases
      • International Travel with Children After Separation
      • Airport Watch List Orders / Pace Alert Orders
      • Relocation – Full Court confirms decision allowing ADF Mother a ‘blank cheque’ relocation to wherever posted in her employment
    • Protecting Assets
      • 10 tips to Protect your Assets in a de facto relationship
      • Hiding assets in a divorce
      • Injunction to stop my ex selling assets
      • Protect your assets and your family after separation
      • My ex is selling assets. What can I do??
      • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
      • What is a Superannuation Payment Flag?
      • Dunworth & Faletti: Application for injunction to stop sale of property where jurisdiction not yet established
    • De Facto relationships
      • Am I in a De Facto Relationship?
      • Breakdown of a De Facto Relationship – Fairbairn v Radecki
    • overseas orders
      • Impact of overseas divorce on Australian property settlement
      • Validity of Overseas Orders – Parenting, Marriage and Divorce Orders
      • Clayton & Bant – A multi-jurisdictional family law dispute
    • Property & Financial Settlement
      • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
      • Initial Contributions Count – 8 years + 1 child = 78%/82% to Husband
      • My Parents lent me money. Is it treated as a gift or a loan?
      • Difference between property and a financial resource in family law
      • Assessing initial contributions in a long relationship
      • The Alter Ego Principle – When a Spouse uses a trust to hide assets
      • CGT rollover for marriage breakdowns – Ellison & Sandini Explained
      • How Trusts are dealt with in a Property Settlement
      • Pet Custody – Who gets the dog in a divorce?
      • Redundancy payment – how is it treated?
      • Future inheritances – when can they be taken into account?
      • What is just and equitable?
      • Is domestic violence relevant in a property settlement?
      • Varying property orders
      • Defaulting on Property Orders is Dangerous
      • Effect of Bankruptcy on property settlement
      • Courtney’s Cases: Centrelink fraud or a fraudulent representation to the Court?
      • Limitation periods against solicitors for defective Financial Agreements
      • Court dismisses application for property settlement for same sex couple of 27 years
    • Binding Financial Agreements
      • Binding Financial Agreements
      • Is my Binding Financial Agreement Binding?
      • Does your Financial Agreement Protect you from a maintenance claim?
      • Superannuation Splitting in Financial Agreements
    • Child Support
      • Child Support Lawyers
      • I want to set aside a Binding Child Support Agreement
      • I want to challenge my child support assessment
    • Mediation Exemptions
      • Mediation
      • Can I go to court without doing mediation first?
      • Do I have to mediate before court? The exemptions Explained
      • NEWS ALERT – You do NOT need a s60I certificate to file your parenting application – Valack & Valack
    • Domestic Violence
      • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO – Domestic Violence Order
      • Common mistakes made in an application for a domestic violence order
      • Do’s and Don’ts when applying for a DVO to succeed
    • Narcissistic Abuse
      • What is Narcissistic Abuse and how to divorce a Narcissist
      • Top 10 Warning Signs of Narcissistic Abuse revealed
      • When is supervised time ordered? Is Narcissistic Abuse enough?
    • Unacceptable Risk
      • What is unacceptable risk & when will a Court change residence?
      • Mother’s persistent accusation that the Father sexually abused their child results in orders for no time with the Mother
      • Change in residence for children because of Mother’s inability to protect the children from harm
    • Evidence in parenting proceedings
      • Admissibility of opinion evidence & expert evidence in family law matters
      • Admissibility of recordings in family law cases
      • Admissibility of admissions at mediation in court proceedings
    • Covid-19
      • The Covid-19 Vaccination – Is mutual parental consent required?
      • I want to apply to the Family Court for inclusion in the Covid-19 List
    • Other Legal
      • NEWSFLASH – What are the New Family Law Rules?
      • Out With the Old, In With the New: Why Fixed Fees are better
      • Apprehended Bias – should Judges & lawyers have drinks pre-judgement?
      • Review of the Family Law System
      • Inquest of Jack & Jennifer Edwards – Lessons Learned
      • WARNING PRACTITIONERS: New Family Law Rules from 1 March 2018
  • Family Law Videos
  • Family Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Success Stories
  • Narcissistic Abuse

Court dismisses application for property settlement for same sex couple of 27 years

March 11, 2018 By Barton Family Law

Chancellor & Mccoy

chancellor & mccoy, no property order

In a recent decision of the Family Court of Chancellor & Mccoy, involving a same sex de facto relationship of 27 years, it was held that no property settlement order was just and equitable.

The Court denied an appeal from the finding of a Trial Judge that it was not ‘just and equitable’ to make an order altering the existing interests of the parties in their property as both parties had kept their financial affairs separate during the relationship.

This case has had an impact on the advice given by lawyers to separated couples in relationships where the parties remained financially independent.

Case Study – Chancellor & Mccoy, No property order

The parties commenced cohabitation in 1983 and separated in 2010. During the relationship, Ms Mccoy purchased several properties in which the parties both lived. Whilst living at Ms Mccoy’s properties, Ms Chancellor contributed financially to the household and also assisted with labour in Ms Mccoy’s renovations to the properties. Ms Mccoy remained solely financially responsible for purchasing the properties, paying the mortgage and all renovation costs.

Ms Chancellor also purchased one property during the relationship with monies she received from her uncle, and the balance of the purchase price was provided through a mortgage in her sole name. Ms Chancellor rented this property to her sister for reduced rent, and was solely financially responsible for paying the mortgage.

After separation, Ms Chancellor received a large inheritance of cash and property from her uncle’s estate.

Ms Chancellor filed an application to the court seeking a property division on the basis that both parties contributed to the large property pool and it was therefore just and equitable for the court to make an order altering the interests of the parties in their property.

The interests of the parties in their property were similar but for Ms Mccoy started to make voluntary payments to her superannuation from 1999 by way of salary sacrifice. At the time of Trial, this had resulted in her assets being worth more than double that of Ms Chancellor.

Relying on principles stated by the High Court in the case of Stanford, in Chancellor & Mccoy no property order was made by the Court. The Judge held that it was not just and equitable to make a property settlement order due to the “lack of financial intertwining, the lack of financial planning for the future, the evident separation of finances and the continued individual ownership of property.”

In Chancellor & Mccoy, no property order was made for the following reasons:

  • The parties conducted their financial affairs separately and there was no intermingling of finances (Ms Chancellor’s payments to Ms Mccoy while living at her property were considered financial assistance not intermingling);
  • They did not have joint bank accounts;
  • Each party was free to use their money as they chose;
  • Each party retained property in their own name;
  • They were responsible for their own debts;
  • They were not involved in each others financial decision making or made aware of the others financial situation;
  • Neither made significant improvements to the value of the other’s property (there was no evidence that the financial and non-financial contributions of Ms Chancellor to Ms Mccoy’s properties when assisting in renovating improved the value of these properties);
  • Neither party made provision for the other through their will or life insurance.
  • At the end of the relationship, Ms Chancellor was left with significant assets accumulated by her during the relationship, including two houses, several motor vehicles and superannuation.
  • Ms Mccoy had retired by the time of trial and Ms Chancellor was still in employment and had the capacity to accumulate more assets and contribute to her superannuation fund.

The court decided in essence that the just and equitable outcome was that each party be allowed to keep the assets they had, without any adjustment.

This decision was appealed on numerous grounds including that the decision was manifestly outside the range of the reasonable ambit of discretion. All appeals were dismissed.

Chancellor & Mccoy, no property order – What have we learned?

In Chancellor & Mccoy, no property order was made after a relationship of 27 years. The Court in that case emphasised that there is no automatic right to a property settlement.

This case will not change anything for the majority of couples. It remains very rare for a court to find that parties to a relationship are not entitled to an order for the division of their property. In most circumstances, an order for the division of property will be considered just and equitable as most couples share the use of their property under certain assumptions that come to an end when the relationship ends.

However, Chancellor & Mccoy may have significant implications for couples who choose to remain financially independent.

If you are uncertain whether and what your entitlements are to a division of property following separation, you should seek legal advice.

Contact our Petrie family law expert Courtney Barton to discuss your individual circumstances and to determine your rights and entitlements.  We will provide you with advice and a plan to help you move on with your life, quickly and cost effectively.

 

Filed Under: Commonly Asked Questions, Property

Barton Family Law

Primary Sidebar

Online Enquiry

.

    I would like to book a reduced rate initial consultation with you

    Footer

    Areas of Practice

    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Mediation Representation
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements

    What makes us different from other Law Firms?

    Our Brisbane Divorce & Family Lawyers:

    • Only do family law all day every day. That makes us really good at what we do;
    • Are dedicated to helping you work through your family law issues so you can have a fresh start;
    • Have your best interests at heart;
    • Have the knowledge and experience to solve your family law problems, no matter how complex;
    • Will help you to reduce the conflict with your former partner;
    • Will fight for you and your children;
    • Provide exceptional quality service to you, tailored to your individual case needs;
    • Will educate you about your options, the steps you need to take and we will develop a strategy to help you to achieve a fair outcome and the best practical outcome for you and your family;
    • Will provide you with practical, realistic, commercial and strategic advice to empower you to make smart decisions following separation that will save you time, money and stress;
    • Will deliver an outcome to you quickly and cost effectively, with fixed fees for certainty;
    • Will do everything within our legal power to get you the best outcome for you and your family;
    • Are with you, supporting you, every step of the way from negotiations, to mediation, to litigation and settlement.
    Individual liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

    Contact Us

    Petrie Office

    • Address: 4/996 Anzac Avenue, Petrie QLD 4501
    • Parking: Underground parking available at the back of the building via O’Loan Street
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Petrie Family Lawyers

    Chermside Office

    • Address: 822 Gympie Road, Chermside QLD 4032
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Chermside Family Lawyers

    Aspley Office

    • Address: Aspley Hypermarket, 59 Albany Creek Road, Aspley QLD 4034
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Aspley Family Lawyers

    Copyright © 2022 | Website hosted by Lift Legal Marketing