• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Phone: 3465 9332

Logo
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Courtney Barton – Legal Practice Director & Founder
    • George Finn – Director
    • Chris Colwill – Senior Associate
    • Ellie Prior – Associate
    • Hannah Radunz – Solicitor
    • Tenayah Miano – Paralegal
    • Alice Chapman – Paralegal
    • Rachel Elaurant – Legal Assistant
  • Our Services
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
  • Fixed Fees
  • Common questions
    • Spousal & Separation
      • Beware the criminal consequences of false allegations of sexual abuse
      • Initial Contributions Count – 8 years + 1 child = 78%/82% to Husband
      • Validity of Overseas Orders – Parenting, Marriage and Divorce Orders
      • Superannuation Splitting in Financial Agreements
      • Is my Binding Financial Agreement Binding?
      • Bodilly & Hand: Spousal Maintenance ordered 17 years after separation
      • Admissibility of admissions at mediation in court proceedings
      • Does your Financial Agreement Protect you from a maintenance claim?
      • The Alter Ego Principle – When a Spouse uses a trust to hide assets
      • Do I have to mediate before court? The exemptions Explained
      • Pet Custody – Who gets the dog in a divorce?
      • Top 10 Myths in family Law Finally Exposed
      • Honesty is the best policy – Why tell your divorce lawyer everything
      • My ex is selling assets. What can I do??
      • 6 secrets revealed to help you protect your assets and your family after separation. No. 1 and 2 will blow your mind.
      • Spousal Maintenance – Do I have to support my ex after divorce?
      • Who stays in the home after separation?
      • Can I go to court without doing mediation first?
      • Assessing initial contributions in a long relationship
      • What to do and what not to do before you separate
      • CGT rollover for marriage breakdowns – Ellison & Sandini Explained
      • Domestic Violence Order Applications – How to boost your chance of success
      • Going back to work after Divorce
      • Mediation
      • 10 tips to Protect your Assets
      • Am I in a De Facto Relationship?
      • Property Acquired after Separation – how is it treated?
      • Divorce – What you need to know
      • Petrie Family Law Expert speaks about ‘The Twelve year Itch’
    • Parent
      • Court Ordered Paternity Test – What, Why and How
      • NEWS ALERT – You do NOT need a s60I certificate to file your parenting application – Valack & Valack
      • What is sole parental responsibility?
      • How does a DVO affect parenting orders?
      • Do you want sole Custody? Here’s what NOT to do.
      • SHOCK: Drug use in Australia worse than ever. Drugs & family law explained
      • SHOCK: Drug use in Australia worse than ever. Drugs & family law explained
      • When is supervised time ordered? Is Narcissistic Abuse enough?
      • Interim Parenting Orders
      • What is substantial and significant time?
      • Am I a parent?
      • My ex is in contravention of a Parenting Order. What can I do?
      • My Parents lent me money. Is it treated as a gift or a loan?
      • Gay Couple Win Appeal on sperm donor ‘parent’
      • How to spend more time with your children
      • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes: Part 2
      • Im not a parent. Can I apply for a parenting order? Non-Parent Parenting orders explained.
      • Can Parenting Orders be changed?
      • Step-Parent Adoption Explained
    • Child
      • What age can a child decide where they live?
      • Finally revealed: Top 10 things people do wrong in child custody matters
      • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
      • I want sole custody of my child
      • Rights to return of your child if taken to a Non-Hague Convention country
      • How to deal with false allegations in family law
      • Unilateral relocation of children
      • Prevention is better than Cure – Interim Relocation of Children Cases
      • International Travel with Children After Separation
      • Airport Watch List Orders / Pace Alert Orders
      • Application to change parenting orders because of children’s changed views dismissed
      • When can you change your child’s surname?
      • Change in residence for children because of Mother’s inability to protect the children from harm
      • Courtney’s Cases: Interim Orders appealed as Judge avoids determining issues
      • Mother’s persistent accusation that the Father sexually abused their child results in orders for no time with the Mother
      • Relocation – Full Court confirms decision allowing ADF Mother a ‘blank cheque’ relocation to wherever posted in her employment
    • Property
      • Top 15 things people do wrong in a property dispute
      • Hiding assets in a divorce
      • Injunction to stop my ex selling assets
      • What is a Superannuation Payment Flag?
      • Difference between property and a financial resource in family law
      • Impact of overseas divorce on Australian property settlement
      • How Trusts are dealt with in a Property Settlement
      • Redundancy payment – how is it treated?
      • Future inheritances – when can they be taken into account?
      • Can the court order someone to leave a house? – Ouster Orders
      • Time Limits in Property Settlement
      • Beware: failure to disclose may derail your consent order
      • Duty of Disclosure
      • What is just and equitable?
      • Why you should formalise your property settlement
      • Is domestic violence relevant in a property settlement?
      • Varying property orders
      • Defaulting on Property Orders is Dangerous
      • Effect of Bankruptcy on property settlement
      • Courtney’s Cases: Centrelink fraud or a fraudulent representation to the Court?
      • Limitation periods against solicitors for defective Financial Agreements
      • Clayton & Bant – A multi-jurisdictional family law dispute
      • Dunworth & Faletti: Application for injunction to stop sale of property where jurisdiction not yet established
      • Court dismisses application for property settlement for same sex couple of 27 years
    • Child Support
      • I want to set aside a Binding Child Support Agreement
      • I want to challenge my child support assessment
    • Other Legal
      • Out With the Old, In With the New: Why Fixed Fees are better
      • NEWSFLASH – What are the New Family Law Rules?
      • Apprehended Bias – should Judges & lawyers have drinks pre-judgement?
      • Inquest of Jack & Jennifer Edwards – Lessons Learned
      • 6 things you MUST know before hiring a family lawyer
      • Admissibility of opinion evidence & expert evidence in family law matters
      • Admissibility of recordings in family law cases
      • COSTS ORDERS
      • WARNING PRACTITIONERS: New Family Law Rules from 1 March 2018
      • Review of the Family Law System
    • Covid-19
      • The Covid-19 Vaccination – Is mutual parental consent required?
      • I want to apply to the Family Court for inclusion in the Covid-19 List
  • Family Law Videos
  • Family Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Success Stories
  • Narcissistic Abuse

Clayton & Bant – A multi-jurisdictional family law dispute

July 14, 2021 By Barton Family Law

If you have separated and you have accumulated assets in multiple countries including countries other than Australia, as occurred in Clayton & Bant, it is vital that you obtain advice from both jurisdictions in relation to your rights as a Court in another country may take a different approach to a family law dispute, than the approach adopted in Australia.

Usually these kinds of circumstances arise where two parties have lived and worked in multiple jurisdictions and so they have accumulated assets in both.

The Family Law Act is applicable in Australia but if orders are made in the Australian Family Courts that are not enforceable in another country, problems arise.

Property Settlement

If you have assets in multiple countries, you should obtain advice in both jurisdictions as to your property settlement rights.

Whilst a Court order made in Australia can deal with assets that are in an overseas jurisdiction, obtaining advice from a lawyer in both countries where assets are held is important in order to ensure that any orders made are enforceable in both countries.

If you have assets located in Australia and another country, questions you should ask yourself are:

  • Does the Federal Circuit or Family Court of Australia have jurisdiction to determine this case?
  • Is there a foreign jurisdiction that would also be able to determine the case?
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages to the case being heard in a jurisdiction other than Australia?
  • Is the Federal Circuit or Family Court of Australia the appropriate jurisdiction to hear the case?
  • If you choose Australia to file an application for property settlement, is the order made in Australia is enforceable in the other country?

When you obtain advice from a lawyer in a foreign jurisdiction, we can liaise with them to make sure that any order that is made in Australia, is legally enforceable in the other country.

Issuance of proceedings in multiple jurisdictions

Difficulties can arise, as did occur in Clayton & Bant, when parties have assets in different jurisdictions as to the appropriate forum to hear the matter.

What if proceedings have been commenced in two different jurisdictions? Which jurisdiction is more appropriate to determine the matter?

In Clayton & Bant, this precise issue arose and the court had to determine (a) which jurisdiction was most appropriate to determine the matter and (b) whether or not the Australian Family Court had jurisdiction to determine financial matters, in circumstances where divorce orders had already been made in the United Arab Emirates, finalising financial matters between the parties including with respect to division of assets and spousal maintenance.

Clayton & Bant [2020] HCA 44

Clayton & Bant – The Facts

The facts of Clayton & Bant are as follows:

The wife was an Australian citizen and the husband  a citizen of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

In 2006, the parties met and commenced living together in Dubai.

In 2007, the parties married in a Sharia court. According to the relevant UAE law, such marriage is a contract and can encompass terms relating to dowry.

Between 2007 – 2013, the parties lived together partly in the UAE and partly in Australia.

In 2009, the parties had a child together.

Each party owned real and personal property in the UAE and Australia.

In 2013, the parties separated. Since separation, the wife and the parties’ child lived in Australia.

Court proceedings were initially commenced in both Australia and the UAE. In that regard:

In 2013, the wife commenced a proceeding in the Family Court of Australia, seeking parenting orders. She later amended her application to also seek a division of assets and spousal maintenance.

In 2014, the husband commenced a proceeding in Dubai seeking a divorce. In that proceeding, he also sought extinguishment of all of the wife’s “…marital rights that are associated with that divorce in terms of all type[s] of alimony, deferred dowry and others as well as compensating him for all material and moral damage at the discretion of the court.”

The wife was notified of the Dubai proceedings but did not appear. She elected not to participate in that proceeding.

In 2015, the Dubai Court made a ruling granting the husband an “irrevocable fault-based divorce”, the effect of which was to dissolve the parties’ marriage. The ruling went on to order the wife to pay AED 100,000 (the amount of the parties’ advanced dowry) to the husband and to pay the husband’s costs of the proceeding.

In 2015, the husband applied to the Family Court of Australia to permanently stay the financial aspects of the Australian family law proceeding. The husband argued that the wife should be prevented from pursuing her claim for a division of assets and spousal maintenance in Australia as:

  1. those rights arose from the same marriage that was the subject of the Dubai divorce proceeding; and
  2. the wife could have sought a division of assets or maintenance in Dubai, but failed to do so.

The husband’s application for a permanent stay was rejected by the Family Court. The Court dismissed the application on the basis that the Dubai proceedings:

  1. Involved no issue of the wife’s right to claim property of the husband, given that the law of the UAE does not confer any such right other than “in relation to property within the jurisdiction in which each have invested.”
  2. Did not deal with any right of the wife to alimony.

Clayton & Bant – The Family Court Appeal

The husband appealed the decision of the Family Court to the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia (the Full Court). The husband’s appeal was successful and the financial aspects of the Australian family law proceeding were permanently stayed.

The Full Court determined that that Dubai law provided for, among other things, a division of assets albeit not in a manner identical to Australia. As such, the relief sought by the wife in Australia was available under Dubai law and the Dubai proceeding had finally determined the underlying cause of action between the parties.

The wife’s failure to seek a division of assets and maintenance in Dubai satisfied the legal principles of res judicata estoppel, such that the wife was prevented from pursuing such relief in Australia.

Clayton & Bant – The High Court appeal

The wife appealed the decision of the Full Court and was granted special leave by the High Court of Australia (the High Court) to proceed with that appeal. The High Court unanimously allowed the appeal from the Full Court’s decision.

In allowing the appeal and setting aside the permanent stay, the High Court held that:

  1. The ruling of the Dubai Court could not give rise to a res judicata estoppel as the legal right to seek orders for property settlement and spousal maintenance under the Family Law Act could only be extinguished by a court making orders pursuant to the Act.
  2. In relation to the wife’s claim for a division of assets, the ruling of the Dubai Court was incapable of founding a cause of action estoppel or an Anshun estoppel because the right to seek a share of a joint investment property in the Dubai proceeding was not equivalent to the nature of the right to seek a property settlement under the Act.
  3. In relation to the wife’s claim for spousal maintenance, while the nature of the rights to alimony under the law of the UAE and to spousal maintenance under the Family Law Act were substantially equivalent, there was a significant difference in the practical consequences of the two legal rights. For that reason, the wife’s choice not to claim alimony in the Dubai proceedings could provide no foundation for the operation of an Anshun estoppel.

Take away points

Clayton & Bant highlights the risks associated with not acting quickly to obtain advice about jurisdiction and not participating in overseas proceedings. Clients should consider in detail which forum to commence proceedings in and proceedings should be commenced urgently to secure that jurisdiction.

It is also important that your lawyer provides you advice as to which jurisdiction can provide a more complete resolution of all issues in dispute between the parties.

Property Settlement proceedings may be instituted in the Family or Federal Circuit Court of Australia, in relation to matrimonial causes under the Family Law Act 1975, by virtue of s39(1) and (4), and in relation to de facto matters by virtue of s39A and s39B, conditional on a party to the proceedings being an Australian citizen, ordinarily resident or present in Australia on date the application is filed. Per section 31(2), the jurisdiction of the Family Court extends to persons and things outside Australia.

Contact Us

If you have a question in relation to a multi-jurisdictional issue such as that which arose in Clayton & Bant, we strongly recommend you obtain legal advice from one of our family law experts about your rights, so that the jurisdiction of your choice, if appropriate, can be promptly secured.

Contact us on 3465 9332 to book an reduced rate consultation with one of our Brisbane Family Lawyers to have a confidential discussion about your individual circumstances, so you can make smart decisions following separation, that will save you money and emotional stress.

Filed Under: Commonly Asked Questions, Property

Barton Family Law

Primary Sidebar

Online Enquiry

.

    I would like to book a reduced rate initial consultation with you

    Footer

    Areas of Practice

    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Mediation Representation
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements

    What makes us different from other Law Firms?

    Our Brisbane Divorce & Family Lawyers:

    • Only do family law all day every day. That makes us really good at what we do;
    • Are dedicated to helping you work through your family law issues so you can have a fresh start;
    • Have your best interests at heart;
    • Have the knowledge and experience to solve your family law problems, no matter how complex;
    • Will help you to reduce the conflict with your former partner;
    • Will fight for you and your children;
    • Provide exceptional quality service to you, tailored to your individual case needs;
    • Will educate you about your options, the steps you need to take and we will develop a strategy to help you to achieve a fair outcome and the best practical outcome for you and your family;
    • Will provide you with practical, realistic, commercial and strategic advice to empower you to make smart decisions following separation that will save you time, money and stress;
    • Will deliver an outcome to you quickly and cost effectively, with fixed fees for certainty;
    • Will do everything within our legal power to get you the best outcome for you and your family;
    • Are with you, supporting you, every step of the way from negotiations, to mediation, to litigation and settlement.
    Individual liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

    Contact Us

    Petrie Office

    • Address: 4/996 Anzac Avenue, Petrie QLD 4501
    • Parking: Underground parking available at the back of the building via O’Loan Street
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Petrie Family Lawyers

    Chermside Office

    • Address: 822 Gympie Road, Chermside QLD 4032
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Chermside Family Lawyers

    Aspley Office

    • Address: Aspley Hypermarket, 59 Albany Creek Road, Aspley QLD 4034
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Aspley Family Lawyers

    Copyright © 2022 | Website hosted by Lift Legal Marketing