• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Phone: 3465 9332

Logo
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Courtney Barton – Legal Practice Director & Founder
    • George Finn – Director
    • Chris Colwill – Senior Associate
    • Ellie Prior – Associate
    • Hannah Radunz – Solicitor
    • Tenayah Miano – Paralegal
    • Alice Chapman – Paralegal
    • Rachel Elaurant – Legal Assistant
  • Our Services
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
  • Fixed Fees
  • Common questions
    • Spousal & Separation
      • Beware the criminal consequences of false allegations of sexual abuse
      • Initial Contributions Count – 8 years + 1 child = 78%/82% to Husband
      • Validity of Overseas Orders – Parenting, Marriage and Divorce Orders
      • Superannuation Splitting in Financial Agreements
      • Is my Binding Financial Agreement Binding?
      • Bodilly & Hand: Spousal Maintenance ordered 17 years after separation
      • Admissibility of admissions at mediation in court proceedings
      • Does your Financial Agreement Protect you from a maintenance claim?
      • The Alter Ego Principle – When a Spouse uses a trust to hide assets
      • Do I have to mediate before court? The exemptions Explained
      • Pet Custody – Who gets the dog in a divorce?
      • Top 10 Myths in family Law Finally Exposed
      • Honesty is the best policy – Why tell your divorce lawyer everything
      • My ex is selling assets. What can I do??
      • 6 secrets revealed to help you protect your assets and your family after separation. No. 1 and 2 will blow your mind.
      • Spousal Maintenance – Do I have to support my ex after divorce?
      • Who stays in the home after separation?
      • Can I go to court without doing mediation first?
      • Assessing initial contributions in a long relationship
      • What to do and what not to do before you separate
      • CGT rollover for marriage breakdowns – Ellison & Sandini Explained
      • Domestic Violence Order Applications – How to boost your chance of success
      • Going back to work after Divorce
      • Mediation
      • 10 tips to Protect your Assets
      • Am I in a De Facto Relationship?
      • Property Acquired after Separation – how is it treated?
      • Divorce – What you need to know
      • Petrie Family Law Expert speaks about ‘The Twelve year Itch’
    • Parent
      • Court Ordered Paternity Test – What, Why and How
      • NEWS ALERT – You do NOT need a s60I certificate to file your parenting application – Valack & Valack
      • What is sole parental responsibility?
      • How does a DVO affect parenting orders?
      • Do you want sole Custody? Here’s what NOT to do.
      • SHOCK: Drug use in Australia worse than ever. Drugs & family law explained
      • SHOCK: Drug use in Australia worse than ever. Drugs & family law explained
      • When is supervised time ordered? Is Narcissistic Abuse enough?
      • Interim Parenting Orders
      • What is substantial and significant time?
      • Am I a parent?
      • My ex is in contravention of a Parenting Order. What can I do?
      • My Parents lent me money. Is it treated as a gift or a loan?
      • Gay Couple Win Appeal on sperm donor ‘parent’
      • How to spend more time with your children
      • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes: Part 2
      • Im not a parent. Can I apply for a parenting order? Non-Parent Parenting orders explained.
      • Can Parenting Orders be changed?
      • Step-Parent Adoption Explained
    • Child
      • What age can a child decide where they live?
      • Finally revealed: Top 10 things people do wrong in child custody matters
      • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
      • I want sole custody of my child
      • Rights to return of your child if taken to a Non-Hague Convention country
      • How to deal with false allegations in family law
      • Unilateral relocation of children
      • Prevention is better than Cure – Interim Relocation of Children Cases
      • International Travel with Children After Separation
      • Airport Watch List Orders / Pace Alert Orders
      • Application to change parenting orders because of children’s changed views dismissed
      • When can you change your child’s surname?
      • Change in residence for children because of Mother’s inability to protect the children from harm
      • Courtney’s Cases: Interim Orders appealed as Judge avoids determining issues
      • Mother’s persistent accusation that the Father sexually abused their child results in orders for no time with the Mother
      • Relocation – Full Court confirms decision allowing ADF Mother a ‘blank cheque’ relocation to wherever posted in her employment
    • Property
      • Top 15 things people do wrong in a property dispute
      • Hiding assets in a divorce
      • Injunction to stop my ex selling assets
      • What is a Superannuation Payment Flag?
      • Difference between property and a financial resource in family law
      • Impact of overseas divorce on Australian property settlement
      • How Trusts are dealt with in a Property Settlement
      • Redundancy payment – how is it treated?
      • Future inheritances – when can they be taken into account?
      • Can the court order someone to leave a house? – Ouster Orders
      • Time Limits in Property Settlement
      • Beware: failure to disclose may derail your consent order
      • Duty of Disclosure
      • What is just and equitable?
      • Why you should formalise your property settlement
      • Is domestic violence relevant in a property settlement?
      • Varying property orders
      • Defaulting on Property Orders is Dangerous
      • Effect of Bankruptcy on property settlement
      • Courtney’s Cases: Centrelink fraud or a fraudulent representation to the Court?
      • Limitation periods against solicitors for defective Financial Agreements
      • Clayton & Bant – A multi-jurisdictional family law dispute
      • Dunworth & Faletti: Application for injunction to stop sale of property where jurisdiction not yet established
      • Court dismisses application for property settlement for same sex couple of 27 years
    • Child Support
      • I want to set aside a Binding Child Support Agreement
      • I want to challenge my child support assessment
    • Other Legal
      • Out With the Old, In With the New: Why Fixed Fees are better
      • NEWSFLASH – What are the New Family Law Rules?
      • Apprehended Bias – should Judges & lawyers have drinks pre-judgement?
      • Inquest of Jack & Jennifer Edwards – Lessons Learned
      • 6 things you MUST know before hiring a family lawyer
      • Admissibility of opinion evidence & expert evidence in family law matters
      • Admissibility of recordings in family law cases
      • COSTS ORDERS
      • WARNING PRACTITIONERS: New Family Law Rules from 1 March 2018
      • Review of the Family Law System
    • Covid-19
      • The Covid-19 Vaccination – Is mutual parental consent required?
      • I want to apply to the Family Court for inclusion in the Covid-19 List
  • Family Law Videos
  • Family Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Success Stories
  • Narcissistic Abuse

Initial Contributions Count – 8 years + 1 child = 78%/82% to Husband

August 12, 2021 By Barton Family Law

Initial Contributions are very important in terms of the assessment of the parties contributions, but especially in shorter relationships.

The assessment of an initial contribution depends on the value of the initial contribution, what it was put towards, the contributions by the other party during the relationship, having regard to the length of the relationship.

The assessment of initial contributions in a longer relationship with children will be very different from the assessment of initial contributions in a shorter relationship.INITIAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Initial Contributions – Distinguishing Jabour

In Horrigan & Horrigan [2020] FamCAFC 25 the Trial Judge ordered that the parties property be divided 78% to the Husband and 22% to the Wife.

The Wife appealed against those orders and ultimately her appeal was dismissed with the Wife to pay the Husband’s costs.

The parties began living together in 2009, married in 2010,  had a child in 2011 and separated in 2017 after a period of 8 years.

The child of the relationship was aged 7 at the time of the trial. At the time of trial,  the wife was 47 and the husband 64. The Wife was in receipt of maintenance from the husband and the parties had a 7 year old child who lived with the Wife and spent time with the Husband for 5 days each fortnight.  They had both been previous married and had children from those previous relationships, all of whom were adults by the time the case came to trial.

At the trial, the Wife contended that the Husband had been physically and sexually abusive to her and argued that her contributions to the relationship were more onerous than otherwise as a result. The trial judge rejected this assertion.

The Husband made allegations that the Wife had gambled excessively during the relationship and that his gambling had resulted in him losing large amounts of money, to the detriment of the pool.  The Trial Judge ultimately concluded that the Wife had lost approximately $40,000 from gambling.

The Trial Judge held as follows:

  • The asset pool at the commencement of cohabitation was $1,700,000 of which the Husband contributed $1,500,000 and the wife contributed $195,000 or 11.5%;
  • The Husband’s ‘initial’ contributions at commencement of cohabitation were far greater than the Wife’s  – 88.5%/11.5% in favour of the Husband;
  • At the time of trial, the pool was $3,650,000 including three properties;
  • The parties contributed equally to the pool since they commenced living together and their contributions were equal up until and following separation;
  • When assessing contributions, the trial judge held these should be valued as to 85%/15% in favour of the Husband.
  • Having regards to future needs s75(2) factors, there should be a 7% adjustment in the Wife’s favour having regard to income earning capacity and care of the child;
  • Therefore,  the division of property ordered was 78%/82% in favour of the Husband.

The wife appealed.

In her appeal, the Wife argued that the trial judge had erred as follows:

Error one – The finding that the wife’s had made a contribution of 15% to the net assets, did not reflect that her contributions had conserved the husband’s properties;

  • The Full Court rejected this argument as it was not supported by the evidence.
  • Even though she helped with the farming duties, not possible to conclude that the Husband’s properties would be useless without her efforts.

Error two –  The finding of equal contributions during cohabitation was not reflected in the outcome

  • The full Court rejected this argument as  “The holistic assessment process requires the myriad of contributions to be identified and weighed.”

Error three – The trial judge had not assessed the contributions holistically and quarantined pre-cohabitation contributions

  • The full Court disagreed that the trial judge had undertaken a ‘mathematical exercise.’ In putting a percentage figure (13%) on wife’s initial contribution the Trial Judge was simply attempting to gauge the materiality of the parties’ respective contributions.
  •  The trial judge did not quarantine the parties’ initial contributions
  • Unlike in the case of Jabour, the Trial Judge did not isolate the H’s contribution of the farming properties from the myriad of other contributions – nor did the trial judge try to find a nexus between the parties’ contributions and certain items of property
  • Jabour involved a long marriage of 24 years.  The length of a relationship “informs the holistic assessment of contributions. Here, the parties relationship subsisted for a little less than 8 years.”

The Full Court was clear that the length of the relationship under consideration was the critical issue in considering what weight is to be given to the parties initial financial contributions in determining the just and equitable split of the pool.  Over time the weight of an initial contribution by one party may diminish by the myriad of contributions of the other party. With this 8 year relationship, the initial contributions still had a significant impact on the overall outcome.

Furthermore, the Full Court held that whilst parties may have equally exerted themselves during the relationship that does not equate to equality of contribution overall – you do not just draw a line in the balance sheet and the parties thereafter share in any increase in value of the pre-cohabitation assets in the percentage of their contributions during the relationship. “Indeed such an approach would be the very antithesis of the holistic assessment of contributions during the course of the relationship.” 

The Full court held that no ground of the Wife’s appeal was made out. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Do you have any questions in relation to separation issues?

Contact our office to book a reduced rate consultation with one of our experienced Brisbane Family Lawyers to have a confidential discussion about your individual circumstances.

Filed Under: Commonly Asked Questions, Spousal/Separation

Barton Family Law

Primary Sidebar

Online Enquiry

.

    I would like to book a reduced rate initial consultation with you

    Footer

    Areas of Practice

    • Child Custody Lawyers Brisbane
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Mediation Representation
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements

    What makes us different from other Law Firms?

    Our Brisbane Divorce & Family Lawyers:

    • Only do family law all day every day. That makes us really good at what we do;
    • Are dedicated to helping you work through your family law issues so you can have a fresh start;
    • Have your best interests at heart;
    • Have the knowledge and experience to solve your family law problems, no matter how complex;
    • Will help you to reduce the conflict with your former partner;
    • Will fight for you and your children;
    • Provide exceptional quality service to you, tailored to your individual case needs;
    • Will educate you about your options, the steps you need to take and we will develop a strategy to help you to achieve a fair outcome and the best practical outcome for you and your family;
    • Will provide you with practical, realistic, commercial and strategic advice to empower you to make smart decisions following separation that will save you time, money and stress;
    • Will deliver an outcome to you quickly and cost effectively, with fixed fees for certainty;
    • Will do everything within our legal power to get you the best outcome for you and your family;
    • Are with you, supporting you, every step of the way from negotiations, to mediation, to litigation and settlement.
    Individual liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

    Contact Us

    Petrie Office

    • Address: 4/996 Anzac Avenue, Petrie QLD 4501
    • Parking: Underground parking available at the back of the building via O’Loan Street
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Petrie Family Lawyers

    Chermside Office

    • Address: 822 Gympie Road, Chermside QLD 4032
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Chermside Family Lawyers

    Aspley Office

    • Address: Aspley Hypermarket, 59 Albany Creek Road, Aspley QLD 4034
    • Phone: 3465 9332
    • Email: [email protected]
    • Website: Aspley Family Lawyers

    Copyright © 2022 | Website hosted by Lift Legal Marketing